Tobacco and Food Industry Intimidation Tactics Exposed

A recent study conducted by researchers at the University of Bath has revealed alarming intimidation tactics employed by the tobacco, ultra-processed food (UPF), and alcohol sectors against researchers and advocates. This study, published in Health Promotion International, highlights the serious nature of these tactics, which are aimed at undermining the integrity and influencing the work of those advocating for stronger regulations on health-harming industries (HHIs).

Intimidation Tactics Exposed

In a comprehensive review, the researchers cataloged various intimidation strategies utilized by these industries since the year 2000. Their analysis involved searching through six significant health and social science databases, including PubMed and Web of Science, employing targeted keywords like "intimidation," "threat," and "researcher." Their findings uncovered a wide-ranging and coordinated effort to discredit researchers and advocates linked to public health.

Common Targets and Responses

Dr. Karen A. Evans-Reeves, a researcher within the Department of Health and Tobacco Control Research Group at the University of Bath, noted: "We found intimidatory tactics towards advocates and researchers in every sector." The most prevalent method, public discreditation, was often attributed to the health-harming industries or their proxies. Other methods included complaints, surveillance, and threats of violence.

“Shining a spotlight on these highly unethical tactics may reduce their chilling effect on improving health and help researchers and advocates understand how to pre-empt and respond.” – Dr. Karen A. Evans-Reeves

Language of Discreditation

The researchers reported that the language employed to undermine scientists and public health advocates is both inflammatory and derogatory. Common terms used by these industries include:

• Extremists
• Fascists
• Nazis
• Zealots
• Nannyists (regarding critics of the alcohol industry)
• Food fascists (targeting food campaigners)
• Health jihadists

Such terms not only create stigmas but can also significantly hinder the ability of researchers to influence public policy.

Prevalence of Health Harming Industries and Effects on Health Policy

The urgency to address the influence of HHIs is underscored by alarming statistics. Research published in The Lancet documented that these industries contribute to approximately one-third to two-thirds of all global deaths, emphasizing the vital need for regulations. Dr. Evans-Reeves stated, "The urgency to tackle the influence of these industries has never been greater."

Future Implications and Research Directions

The findings from this study reveal the critical challenges posed by intimidation tactics. To safeguard public health efforts, it is essential for advocates and researchers to have strategies in place to combat these unlawful tactics effectively. Understanding the nature and scope of intimidation can empower those in the public health sector to continue their work. Furthermore, this research opens avenues for future investigation into:

• Effective responses to corporate intimidation
• The psychological impacts on researchers facing public discreditation
• Building resilience among public health advocates

Conclusion

This study shines a much-needed light on the urgent issue of intimidation within health-harming industries, revealing the extent to which these sectors will go to protect their interests at the expense of public health. As Dr. Evans-Reeves aptly noted, "Perseverance in the face of intimidation is vital for the future of public health advocacy."

Literature Cited

[1] Evans-Reeves, K. A., et al. (2024). Intimidation against advocates and researchers in the tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food spaces: a review, _Health Promotion International_.

[2] Lifespan.io